401(k) Monitor

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Retirement Plan

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP · Birmingham, AL · EIN 630243316 · Plan 001 · Form 5500 for plan year 2024

What Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP put into the plan, per active participant

$14,926

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP put $14,926 into this plan for each of its 1,172 active participants in plan year 2024. That is the whole employer side, matching money, profit sharing, non-elective and safe-harbor contributions and reallocated forfeitures together, because the Form 5500 reports them on one line, so it is not the match rate.

0 · least per person100 · most per person

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP put in more per active participant than 97% of plans with 1,000–4,999 participants at law, consulting and engineering firms. The middle plan in that group of 797 reported $3,067. Law, consulting and engineering comes from business code 541110, which Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP entered on its own Form 5500. Sponsors pick that code themselves, so a code that does not describe what the employer does ranks the plan against the wrong companies.

What this figure cannot separate: how much Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP pays, and how much it puts in

This is dollars, not a rate. A Form 5500 carries no payroll, so the figure reflects both how much the employer puts in and how much the employer pays: two plans running the same formula report different amounts when one pays better. Crossing the peer group with industry holds most of that difference still, and none of it disappears.

This is one plan year, not an average. A true-up, a plan merger or a one-off contribution moves a single year on its own.

Source: Form 5500 filing for the plan year ended December 31, 2024, received by the DOL November 25, 2025 · DOL EFAST2

What the plan cost, per participant

$423.99

The plan paid $423.99 per participant in plan-paid administrative expenses in plan year 2024, more expensive than 100% of plans with 1,000–4,999 participants. The middle plan of that size paid $84.96.

Why a plan this big pays less per person before anything else

Bigger plans pay less per head by construction, because the same negotiated bill divides across more people. That is why this ranking sits inside the plan's own size cohort and is never taken across all plans.

Schedule H reports only what came out of plan assets. Fees the sponsor pays directly, and fees taken inside fund expense ratios, never appear here, so this is a floor and not the all-in cost.

401(k) Monitor Score

68 out of 100

Where this plan stands against plans of its size and industry on two amounts its Form 5500 reports: employer money in per active person, and plan-paid cost per person. It reads no match formula, no vesting schedule and no fund lineup, because a Form 5500 states none of them.

  • What the employer put in, per active participant: $14,926. Higher than 97% of plans with 1,000–4,999 participants at law, consulting and engineering firms.
  • What the plan cost, per participant: $424. Nothing among plans with 1,000–4,999 participants costs more.

How this score is built

On this page: where the match terms are stated · what to check next · every figure on the filing · fees itemised · the plans this one is ranked against · service providers

The match and vesting terms, from a Form 11-K

The match formula and the vesting schedule are stated in a Form 11-K, which is filed only by employers whose plan holds company stock. A Form 5500 reports neither.

What Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP puts in

Not in public filings for this employer

We have no SEC Form 11-K for this employer, and the Form 5500 this page is built from does not report match terms.

Two places state the terms in full: your plan’s Summary Plan Description, which your employer must provide on request, and your recordkeeper’s site, which for this plan is Schwab Workplace.

What you contribute to collect all of it

Not in public filings for this employer

The rate that collects the full match is part of the match formula, which a Form 5500 does not report.

Vesting score

Not scored

The vesting schedule is stated in a Form 11-K, and we have none for this employer.

A schedule this cannot read at whole-year anniversaries is left without a number rather than given a middle one.

The formula, the six-year window and a worked example

What the plan costs, against plans of its size

100th percentile

$423.99 per participant in plan-paid administrative cost, more expensive than 100% of plans with 1,000–4,999 participants.

What to check next

  • What to ask about the fees

    This plan paid $423.99 per participant out of plan assets, more than 100% of plans with 1,000–4,999 participants, where the middle plan paid $84.96. The filing does not say what the difference buys. Two questions put that to a benefits or HR team: what the recordkeeping and administration contract costs, and how much of it comes out of participant accounts rather than being paid by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP. The lines this total is made of are further down.

  • Your own numbers are not on this page

    Every figure here is the whole plan for plan year 2024, taken from one filing and divided by headcounts. Your own contribution rate, your balance and the fees taken from your account are on your recordkeeper’s site, which this filing names as Schwab Workplace. What you may put in during a year is set by the IRS and not by the plan: this year’s limits ↗.

Key figures

From Schedule H of Form 5500 filing 20251125100010NAL0003141361001, plan year 2024.
Total plan assets, end of year$694,313,488
Net assets$694,313,488
Participants, beginning of year1,451
Of which active1,172
Plan typeSingle employer
Size cohortThe peer group we rank fees against.1,000–4,999 participants
Employer share of the money that went in, plan year 2024The rest came from employees, who put in $16,835,380. The share falls when employees save more, so a plan whose staff contribute heavily reads lower here through no act of the employer. It is printed as a fact and it is not part of the score.51%

Plan-paid administrative expenses

The plan paid $615,216 in administrative expenses in plan year 2024, across 1,451 participants: $423.99 per participant.

Contract administrator fees$8,750
Professional feesnot reported in filing
Investment management fees$500,592
Other administrative feesnot reported in filing

These are plan-paid expenses from Schedule H only. Fees the sponsor pays directly, and fees embedded in fund expense ratios, never appear here. This figure is a floor, not the all-in cost, and a low number is not “free”.

The plans this one is ranked against

Fees on this page are ranked against the 1,000–4,999 participant cohort, where the median plan pays $84.96 per participant. The sponsor files from Alabama, one of 640 plans on file there, at a median of $128.77 per participant. Its business code places the plan at law, consulting and engineering firms, one of 7,635 on file, which run to a median of $152.18.

Plans of a similar size in Alabama

The plans nearest this one by participant count, out of 83 in its peer group. Cost per participant is each plan’s own Schedule H figure, and a filing that reported no administrative expenses says so instead of showing a zero.
PlanParticipantsCost per participant
Nhs Affiliated Companies 401(k) Profit Sharing PlanNhs Management, LLC4,307$38.70
Pch Hotels And Resorts, Inc. 401(k) PlanPch Hotels And Resorts, Inc.1,593$87.67
Redstone Federal Credit Union Employees' Savings & Retirement Plan & TrustRedstone Federal Credit Union1,588$120.88
Adtran, Inc. 401(k) Retirement PlanAdtran, Inc.1,438$129.75
Encore Rehabilitation, Inc. 401(k) PlanEncore Rehabilitation, Inc.1,361$95.60

Service providers (Schedule C)

Recordkeeper: Charles Schwab (as filed: “SCHWAB RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES INC”)

769 plans on file name Charles Schwab as their recordkeeper, at a median of $127.09 per participant.

Providers from Schedule C, Part 1, Item 2 of filing 20251125100010NAL0003141361001. Direct compensation is paid from plan assets. Amounts in USD.
ProviderService codesDirect comp. ($)Indirect comp. ($)
Schwab Retirement Plan Services Inc.50, 64, 15159,324not reported
Capfinancial Partners LLC50, 28, 26120,803not reported
Hightower Advisors LLC50, 2660,170not reported
Thoroughbred Financial Serv50, 2652,128not reported
Capwealth Advisors LLC50, 2647,015not reported
City National Rochdale LLC50, 2642,557not reported
The Welch Group LLC50, 2638,812not reported
Woodmont Investment Counsel Ll50, 2638,251not reported
Savant Capital LLC50, 2626,617not reported
Patten And Patten Inc.50, 2620,489not reported
North Point Portfolio Managers50, 2818,358not reported
Lbmc Investment Advisors LLC50, 2616,732not reported
Nbc Securities Inc.50, 2616,308not reported
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.72, 62, 71, 59, 50, 3312,6000
Waverly Advisors LLC50, 2612,092not reported
Shayne & Jacobs LLC50, 2611,973not reported
Eudaimonia Advisors LLC50, 2611,690not reported
Buckingham Strategic Partners50, 268,806not reported
Black Pinckard LLC50, 108,750not reported
Kingswood Wealth Advisors LLC50, 265,213not reported
Rfg Advisory LLC50, 265,210not reported

Source

DatasetDOL EFAST2 Form 5500 bulk data (FOIA)
Form year2024
Filing ACK_ID20251125100010NAL0003141361001
Dataset last refreshedJuly 28, 2026

Bulk dataset at askebsa.dol.gov ↗ · Look up the filing on EFAST2 ↗

Filings lag by design: a plan can file up to 9½ months after its year ends, so this is the newest data on file. Why filings lag

This is an amended filing. It replaces the sponsor's earlier submission for the same year.

Cite this page

401(k) Monitor, "Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Retirement Plan: Form 5500 facts", from DOL EFAST2 filing 20251125100010NAL0003141361001, plan year ended December 31, 2024. 401(k) Monitor Score 68 out of 100 (exact value 68.09).